Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Exp Brain Res. 2010 Apr 9;203(2):271–283. doi: 10.1007/s00221-010-2231-5

Table 1.

Frequency of responses for StimulusTA and stimulus trains

Muscle StimulusTA
Stimulus Train
FAC SPR % FAC FAC SPR % FAC
CECU 21 (15) 4 (2) 85 (88) 148 (16) 8 (1) 95 (94)
CFCR 3 (1) 20 (1) 13 (50) 91 (1) 25 (1) 78 (50)
CBIC 0 (0) 3 (2) 0 (0) 38 (1) 36 (1) 51 (50)
CBRAC 0 (0) 0 (0) −(−) 64 (0) 0 (0) 100 (−)
CTRLA 43 (18) 3 (1) 93 (95) 92 (18) 8 (1) 92 (95)
CTRLO 47 (19) 14 (7) 77 (73) 84 (20) 45 (6) 65 (77)
CADLT 0 (0) 0 (0) − (−) 22 (0) 13 (0) 63 (−)
CPMJ 3 (1) 93 (47) 3 (2) 8 (6) 85 (42) 9 (13)
CPDLT 3 (2) 1 (1) 75 (67) 62 (3) 0 (0) 100 (100)
CLAT 4 (1) 61 (25) 7 (4) 63 (14) 67 (12) 48 (54)
CMTR 2 (1) 9 (0) 18 (100) 106 (1) 17 (0) 86 (100)
CUTR 72 (41) 25 (16) 74 (72) 136 (38) 43 (19) 76 (67)
IECU 5 (1) 32 (18) 14 (5) 53 (4) 39 (15) 58 (21)
IFCR 13 (4) 16 (8) 45 (33) 152 (11) 8 (1) 95 (92)
IBIC 10 (3) 0 (0) 100 (100) 101 (3) 11 (0) 90 (100)
IBRAC 3 (1) 0 (0) 100 (100) 94 (1) 0 (0) 100 (100)
ITRLA 4 (1) 62 (20) 6 (5) 50 (6) 60 (15) 45 (29)
ITRLO 9 (6) 59 (16) 13 (27) 37 (13) 81 (9) 31 (59)
IADLT 0 (0) 0 (0) − (−) 46 (0) 2 (0) 96 (−)
IPMJ 56 (35) 8 (1) 88 (97) 79 (33) 18 (3) 81 (92)
IPDLT 2 (1) 12 (5) 14 (17) 48 (6) 1 (0) 98 (100)
ILAT 19 (6) 47 (23) 29 (21) 66 (10) 70 (19) 48 (34)
IMTR 3 (1) 2 (0) 60 (100) 118 (1) 31 (0) 79 (100)
IUTR 19 (16) 56 (22) 25 (42) 98 (17) 58 (21) 63 (45)

Facilitation and suppression evoked responses during the control phase of the task in each muscle for both methods are expressed as counts. The numbers in parentheses are control data constrained to sites where both methods evoked a response in a given muscle. The prevalence of facilitation responses evoked in each muscle is expressed as a percentage. Each percentage of facilitation is calculated by dividing the number of facilitation responses by the total number of evoked responses for that muscle

I ipsilateral, C contralateral