Skip to main content
. 2010 Apr 15;66(1-2):114–125. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.03.013

Figure 5.

Figure 5

SFC as a Function of Attention

(A) SFC for a 50% contrast stimulus averaged across all recording sites from monkey HU and monkey HO. SFC was strongest in the gamma range (30–50 Hz, gray bar at the bottom of the graph). Attending to the RF resulted in lower SFC (solid lines, gray shaded area) compared with that resulting from attending away (dashed lines). Shaded (dashed) area shows SEM.

(B) Average SFC in the gamma range as a function of stimulus contrast and attention.

(C) Average SFC in the gamma range as a function of stimulus size and attention. Solid lines show attend-RF conditions; dashed lines, attend-away conditions. p values (two-factor RM ANOVA) denote whether attention or stimulus type had a significant influence on SFC in the gamma range or whether there was an interaction between attention and stimulus type. n denotes the number of recording sites contributing to the sample. Error bars show SEM.