Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Couns Psychol. 2010 Jul 1;57(3):304–316. doi: 10.1037/a0020030

Table 2.

Intercorrelations among Valid CAPI-Abuse, Differentiation of Self Inventory Subscales, and SASB Intrex Scores (N = 51)

Measure 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
1. DSI Emotional Reactivity ---
2. DSI I-Position .03 ---
3. DSI Emotional Cutoff .72** .06 ---
4. DSI Fusion with Others .39** −.27 .26 ---

5. SASB Introject-Wt. Affiliation .34** .48** .35* .00 ---
6. SASB Introject-Wt. Autonomy .21 −.25 .13 .23 −.08 ---

7. SASB Mother-Wt. Affiliation .22 .35* .19 −.23 .28 −.16 ---
8. SASB Mother-Wt. Autonomy .20 − .21 .19 .17 .02 .25 −.08 ---
9. SASB Father-Wt. Affiliation .10 .35* .04 −.31 .31 −.20 .48** −.16 --
10. SASB Father- Wt. Autonomy .08 −.05 .23 .12 .09 .21 −.13 .33 −.17 --

11. CAPI Abuse Score .68** −.24 .63** −.20 .58** −.17 −.12 −.08 −.01 −.21 --

Note. Higher scores on the DSI measures indicate greater differentiation, specifically, less Emotional Reactivity, greater ability to take an I-Position in relationships, less Emotional Cutoff, and less Fusion with Others. Higher CAPI Abuse scores represent greater child abuse potential. Higher SASB Intrex Weighted Affiliation and Autonomy scores indicate more affiliative and autonomy-granting or -taking positions, respectively.

*

p < .05;

**

p < .01.