Table 5.
Frequency | Coefficient B | Odds Ratio | P-value | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
G-T-T | Model 1 | 0.13 | 0.45 | 1.58 | 0.21 |
Model 2 | 0.13 | 0.55 | 1.74 | 0.16 | |
G-T-C | Model 1 | 0.07 | 0.14 | 1.15 | 0.84 |
Model 2 | 0.07 | -0.13 | 0.88 | 0.86 | |
G-C-T | Model 1 | 0.06 | 0.47 | 1.59 | 0.82 |
Model 2 | 0.06 | -0.81 | 0.44 | 0.71 | |
G-C-C | Model 1 | 0.05 | -6.02 | 0.002 | 0.08 |
Model 2 | 0.05 | -7.31 | 0.0007 | 0.05 | |
C-T-T | Model 1 | 0.07 | -0.97 | 0.38 | 0.39 |
Model 2 | 0.07 | -0.99 | 0.37 | 0.42 | |
C-T-C | Model 1 | 0.06 | 1.32 | 3.76 | 0.52 |
Model 2 | 0.06 | 1.99 | 7.28 | 0.35 | |
C-C-T | Model 1 | 0.21 | -0.19 | 0.83 | 0.57 |
Model 2 | 0.21 | -0.16 | 0.85 | 0.66 | |
C-C-C | Model 1 | 0.36 | Reference | ||
Model 2 | 0.36 | Reference |
Three SNPs in the haplotypes were arranged in the following order: rs1049673, rs3211931, and rs7807607
Global association for haplotypes with metabolic syndrome for model 1 was P=0.45, and P=0.23 for model 2
For odds of metabolic syndrome, haplotypes were compared with reference haplotype C-C-C
Model 1 was adjusted for sex, age, education, alcohol use, smoking, physical activity, and population admixture, and model 2 for all variables in model 1 and BMI