Skip to main content
. 2010 Jul 21;2(4):390–401.

Table 1.

Echocardiographic characterization of NTG, TG and KO mice from 10 to 20 weeks of age

10 week
16 week 20 week
NTG TG KO KO KO NTG TG
n 36 30 23 12 12 12 12
LVIDd (mm) 3.79±0.21 3.74±0.18 3.58±0.28* 3.84±0.15 3.87±0.19 3.77±0.18 3.72±0.32
LVIDs (mm) 2.34±0.21 2.28±0.20 2.26±0.24 2.61±0.14* 2.64±0.17 2.40±0.17 2.33±0.29
LVPWd (mm) 0.77±0.10 0.76±0.12 0.85±0.12* 0.88±0.09 0.90±0.06* 0.82±0.08 0.76±0.07
HR (bpm) 438±45 415±39 443±45 403±26 444±44 432±49 445±36
FS (%) 38.4±3.8 39.5±4.6 37.2±3.6 32.2±1.8* 31.3±1.9* 37.4±3.5 37.3±4.2
EF (%) 69.2±4.7 70.6±5.5 68.0±4.7 61.1±2.5* 59.8±2.7* 68.0±4.2 67.9±5.2
EDV (μl) 61.8±7.9 61.2±8.5 54.6±9.5* 65.2±5.5 65.5±7.2 63.2±7.5 61.0±9.7
ESV (μl) 19.1±4.1 17.9±3.8 17.6±4.8 25.4±3.0* 26.3±3.3* 20.2±3.5 19.3±5.5

LVIDd: Left ventricular internal diameter atthe end of diastole; LVIDs: Left ventricular internal diameter atthe end of systole; LVPWd: Left ventricular posterior wall thickness at the end of diastole; HR: Heart rate in beats per minute; FS: Percentage fractional shortening; EF: Ejection fraction; EDV: LV volume at end-diastole; ESV: LV volume at end-systole; Mean±SD.

*

P<0.05; KO compared to NTG and TG at corresponding age. No statistical significant difference was detected for any of the parameters between NTG and TG at anytime point.