Skip to main content
. 2010 Jun 15;285(34):26390–26405. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.142299

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3.

Effect of increasing mutant α1(AD) subunit cDNA on surface and total α1(AD) subunit protein expression. We transfected HEK293T cells with empty vector (negative control, shaded histograms) or 0.250 μg of β2 and γ2S subunits and 0.125 μg of α1h subunit cDNA (hemizygous positive control, solid line histogram) or 0.250 μg of β2 and γ2S subunits, 0.125 μg of α1r subunit, and increasing amounts of either α1(AD)h or α1h subunit cDNA. We measured the total (A and C) and surface (B and D) α1(AD)h and α1h subunit fluorescence by flow cytometry. A and B, dotted lines depict the fluorescence of cells transfected with 0.125 μg of α1(AD)h subunits, and the dashed lines depict the fluorescence of cells transfected with 2 μg of α1(AD)h subunits. C and D, we depicted the α1(AD)h (●) and α1h (○) fluorescence normalized to positive control for each mass of α1(AD)h or α1h subunit cDNA that we transfected. When measuring total α1(AD)h and α1h expression (C), increasing both α1(AD)h and α1h subunit cDNA caused linear increases in α1(AD)h and α1h subunit protein expression until α1h subunit expression saturated when it was greater than 300% that of positive (pos) control. When measuring surface α1(AD)h and α1h expression (D), increasing α1h subunit cDNA caused proportional increases in α1h subunit expression, but increasing α1(AD)h subunit cDNA resulted in very little change in surface α1(AD)h subunit expression. E, we replotted the surface (surf) α1(AD)h and α1h subunit expression as a function of total expression. Both surface α1(AD)h and α1h subunit expression increased linearly with total expression (r2 = 0.82 and 0.95, respectively, n ≥ 3). However, there was an 8-fold greater increased surface α1h subunit expression than α1(AD)h subunit expression for equal increases in total expression. To determine whether the presence of the wild type α1r subunit facilitated the surface trafficking of α1(AD)h subunits, we repeated experiments in the absence of the α1r subunit and found no significant difference in the surface expression of the α1(AD)h subunit in the absence of the α1r subunit (n = 3, data not shown).