Skip to main content
. 2010 Aug 5;13:30. doi: 10.1186/1758-2652-13-30

Table 4.

Adherence and acceptability of the Duet, by previous diaphragm experience (n = 83)

Dia-naïve ppts (n = 41) Dia-experienced ppts (n = 42) p value*
Continuous regimen adherence n % n %
Duet regimen adherence
 Worn at least 80% of days 37 94.9 34 85.0 0.26
 Worn 100% of days 33 84.6 31 77.5 0.57
Duet adherence during sex
 Worn at least 80% of sex acts 38 97.4 36 90.0 0.36
 Worn 100% of sex acts 36 92.3 34 85.0 0.48
Precoital regimen adherence
Duet adherence during sex
 Worn at least 80% of sex acts 36 87.8 41 100.0 0.06
 Worn 100% of sex acts 35 85.4 38 92.7 0.48
Acceptability
Very comfortable wearing the Duet continuously 34 85.0 35 87.5 0.74
 Somewhat comfortable 6 15.0 4 10.0
 Not at all 0 - 1 2.5
Very comfortable inserting and removing the Duet before and after each act of sex 37 90.2 40 95.2 0.51
 Somewhat comfortable 3 7.3 2 4.8
 Not at all 1 2.4 0 -
Willingness to use Duet if you thought you were at risk for HIV and Duet could protect you 1.00
 I definitely would use the Duet 34 85.0 34 85.0
 I maybe would use the Duet 5 12.5 6 15.0
 I maybe would not use the Duet 1 2.5 0 -
 I definitely would not use the Duet 0 - 0 -
Preferred regimen 0.13
 Continuous 20 50.0 11 27.5
 Precoital 17 42.5 24 60.0
 Same 3 7.5 5 12.5
Preferred regimen of partner 0.34
 Continuous 18 45.0 12 30.0
 Precoital 19 47.5 22 55.0
 Same 3 7.5 6 15.0

*P value for the comparison between diaphragm-naïve and diaphragm-experienced participants, based on Fisher's exact test