Skip to main content
. 2010 Apr 27;17(9):2312–2320. doi: 10.1245/s10434-010-1071-7

Table 3.

Cox regression analyses

Patient group Hazard ratio (95% CI) P value
Entire cohort ( n  = 5935)
 Age (y)
  <55a 1.00
  56–65 1.10 (1.01–1.21) .037
  66–75 1.26 (1.16–1.37) <.001
  >75 1.48 (1.35–1.64) <.001
 Sex
  Femalea 1.00
  Male 1.07 (1.00–1.13) .035
 Node status
  Negativea 1.00
  Positive 1.38 (1.30–1.47) <.001
 Tumor size (cm)
  <2a 1.00
  >2 1.37 (1.27–1.48) <.001
  Tumor grade
  Lowa 1.00
  High 1.40 (1.31–1.48) <.001
Stage I ( n  = 845)
 Age (y)
  <55a 1.00
  56–65 1.21 (.92–1.58) .18
  66–75 1.50 (1.17–1.91) .001
  >75 1.72 (1.31–2.26) <.001
 Tumor size (cm)
  <2a 1.00
  >2 1.33 (1.11–1.60) .002
  Tumor grade
  Lowa 1.00
  High 1.28 (1.07–1.54) .007
Stage IIA ( n  = 1501)
 Tumor size (cm)
  <2a 1.00
  >2 1.27 (1.10–1.47) .001
 Tumor grade
  Lowa 1.00
  High 1.43 (1.26–1.61) <.001
Stage IIB ( n  = 3140)
 Age (y)
  <55a 1.00
  56–65 1.04 (.92–1.17) .543
  66–75 1.23 (1.10–1.38) <.001
  >75 1.54 (1.34–1.76) <.001
 Tumor size (cm)
  <2a 1.00
  >2 1.37 (1.23–1.54) <.001
 Tumor grade
  Lowa 1.00
  High 1.38 (1.27–1.50) <.001
Stage III ( n  = 384)
 Age (y)
  <55a 1.00
  56–65 1.19 (.86–1.64) .29
  66–75 1.37 (1.00–1.86) .047
  >75 1.81 (1.28–2.57) .001
 Tumor grade
  Lowa 1.00
  High 1.28 (1.02–1.59) .032
Stage IV ( n  = 270)
 Tumor grade
  Lowa 1.00
  High 1.58 (1.21–2.05) .001

n = patients with all variables available for regression analysis

aReferent