Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010 May 7;58(6):1058–1062. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.02863.x

Table 2.

Impact of Fecal Incontinence and Urinary Incontinence on Nursing Home Referral by Health Status

Probability of Referral Relative Risk of Referral
With vs. without UI With vs. without FI
Continent UI only FI RR CI p RR CI P
Base case 21
(2.9%)
42
(5.9%)
104
(14.6%)
2.00 1.20–
3.34
0.005 4.95 3.13–
7.82
<0.001
≥2 chronic
illnesses
95
(13.3%)
151
(21.2%)
223
(31.3%)
1.59 1.26–
2.01
<0.001 2.35 1.89–
2.92
<0.001
Cognitively
impaired
247
(34.6%)
300
(42.0%)
367
(51.5%)
1.21 1.06–
1.39
0.002 1.49 1.31–
1.68
<0.001
Mobility
impaired
411
(57.6%)
482
(67.6%)
528
(74.1%)
1.17 1.08–
1.27
<0.001 1.28 1.19–
1.38
<0.001

UI=Urinary Incontinence; FI=Fecal Incontinence