Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010 May 7;58(6):1019–1026. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.02871.x

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of population by intervention status

Characteristic DAP Group
N=282
Usual Care Group
N=175
Female, N (%) 174 (61) 121 (69)
White race, N (%) 272 (96) 147 (84)
Community Residence, N (%) 267 (95) 159 (91)
Clinical dementia*, N (%) 129 (46) 56 (32)
Mean Age (years), (mean ± s.d.) 83.8 ± 7.4 84.4 ± 7.2
Mean Charlson comorbidity score,
(mean ± s.d.)
2.6 ± 2.5 2.6 ± 2.2
Mean pre-illness ADL Function
(0–16, 16 fully independent), (mean ±
s.d.)
13.2 ± 3.4 13.5 ± 3.1
PAC Admission Delirium Severity
(0–30, 30 most severe)^, (mean ± s.d.)
12.8 ± 4.2 12.1 ± 4.1

Abbreviation: DAP: Delirium Abatement Program

*

Clinical dementia based on report of proxy informant from the intake Charlson comoribidty questionnaire ( 25) or an ICD code consistent with dementia in the hospital discharge summary

Based on the Charlson comorbidity interview administered to the participant’s next of kin ( 25)

ADL Function measured using the modified Katz Activities of Living Scale (27, 28), with 8 items, each scored 0, dependent, 1, requires assistance, 2 independent.

^

Delirium severity measured using the Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale (MDAS) (23)

Note: As per recommendations on the analysis of clinical trials, P values are not provided for this comparison table.