Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Dev Cell. 2010 Jul 20;19(1):27–38. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2010.06.015

Figure 4. Heterozygosity of Yap suppresses Nf2 mutant liver phenotypes.

Figure 4

(A) Gross liver images from two littermates at 16 months of age. Left: Alb-Cre; Nf2flox2/flox2; Yap+/+. Right: Alb-Cre; Nf2flox2/flox2; Yapflox/+. Note the massive overgrowth and tumor formation in Nf2 mutant liver (left) and the normal appearance of Nf2, Yap+/− liver (right). Scale bar = 1 cm.

(B–C) H&E staining (B) and CK staining (C) showing the prevalence of bile duct hamartoma in Nf2 mutant livers (left) and the greatly diminished bile duct hyperplasia in Nf2 Yap+/− livers (right). Scale bars = 125 μm.

(D) H&E staining showing HCC in Nf2 mutant liver (left) and the absence of HCC in Nf2 Yap+/− liver (right). Scale bar = 60 μm.

(E) Control (top), Nf2 (middle) and Nf2 Yap+/− (bottom) livers from P0 animals were analyzed for Ki67 staining (green) and counterstained for the BEC marker cytokeratin (red). Note the abundance of Ki67-positive BECs in Nf2 livers, but not in control or Nf2 Yap+/− livers. Scale bar = 20 μm.

(F) Similar to (E) except that apoptosis was analyzed by TUNEL staining (green). Note the general absence of TUNEL-positive BECs in all genotypes.

(G) Quantification of Ki67- and TUNEL-positive BECs from (E–F). Values are means ± SEM (n = 5). ***, p < 0.001, t-test.

See Figure S4 for data supplemental to Figure 4.