Skip to main content
. 2010 Mar 5;159(8):1672–1680. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2010.00651.x

Table 2.

Radiological, biomechanical and micro-CT analysis 2, 5 and 10 weeks after fracture of perindopril-treated and untreated animals

2 weeks
5 weeks
10 weeks
Perindopril Control P Perindopril Control P Perindopril Control P
Radiology
Cl.Dm/F.Dm (%) 111.3 ± 4.0 104.2 ± 2.1 0.14 139.7 ± 4a 134.1 ± 9.6 0.57 124.0 ± 5.1 137.3 ± 4.5 0.06
Goldberg score 0.5 ± 0.1 0.6 ± 0.2 0.14 1.3 ± 0.2 1.2 ± 0.2 0.80 1.6 ± 0.1 1.9 ± 0.1 0.08
Biomechanics
Max. torque (%) 0.3 ± 0.0 0.1 ± 0.03 <0.001 97.2 ± 18.5 65.0 ± 12.6 0.18 80.3 ± 8.2 85.2 ± 6.6 0.65
Angle (%) 98.8 ± 16.5 81.3 ± 18.9 0.50 70.4 ± 6.5 94.9 ± 17.1 0.21 89.5 ± 18.8 82.4 ± 4.8 0.72
Stiffness (%) 0.5 ± 0.2 0.2 ± 0.1 0.12 148.1 ± 35.1 74.5 ± 13.0 0.07 113.6 ± 21.8 104.4 ± 6.9 0.70
Micro-CT analysis
Bone volume (mm3) 3.9 ± 0.2 4.7 ± 0.3 0.06
BMD (mgHA·mm−3) 1058.0 ± 7.6 1051.0 ± 10.5 0.60

Data are mean ± SEM.

a

P < 0.05 versus perindopril-treated animals after 10 weeks.

BMD, bone mineral density; Cl.Dm/F.Dm, maximum callus diameter/femur diameter.