Skip to main content
. 2010 Mar 5;159(8):1672–1680. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2010.00651.x

Table 3.

Histomorphometric analysis 2, 5 and 10 weeks after fracture of perindopril-treated and untreated animals

Histomorphometry 2 weeks
5 weeks
10 weeks
Perindopril Control P Perindopril Control P Perindopril Control P
Gap width (mm) 0.2 ± 0.0 0.2 ± 0.0a 0.29 0.0 ± 0.0 0.2 ± 0.1 <0.001 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 1.00
Cl.Dm/F.Dm (%) 211.3 ± 16.1 151.1 ± 17.3 0.02 164.1 ± 9.5 127.8 ± 8.6 <0.05 139.4 ± 6.0 137.7 ± 9.5 0.89
Pc.Ar (mm2) 5.2 ± 0.6 2.1 ± 0.8 <0.01 3.2 ± 0.5 1.0 ± 0.4 <0.01 2.6 ± 0.4 2.5 ± 0.5 0.79
Bone/Pc.Ar (%) 42.9 ± 7.7 36.7 ± 10.4 0.64 96.4 ± 3.6 90.9 ± 9.1 0.53 100.0 ± 0.0 100.0 ± 0.0 1.00
Cartilage/ Pc.Ar (%) 40.5 ± 6.9 19.9 ± 9.4 0.10 0.3 ± 0.3 0.9 ± 0.9 0.42 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 1.00
F.t./Pc.Ar (%) 16.6 ± 1.7 43.4 ± 16.3 0.06 3.4 ± 3.4 8.3 ± 8.3 0.54 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 1.00
Healing score 1.3 ± 0.3 0.3 ± 0.2 <0.01 3.8 ± 0.7 2.0 ± 0.7 <0.05 4.0 ± 0.0 4.0 ± 0.0 1.00

Data shown in the Table are mean ± SEM.

a

P < 0.05 versus perindopril-treated animals after 5 weeks.

Cl.Dm/F.Dm, maximum callus diameter/femur diameter; F.t., fibrous tissue; Pc.Ar, periosteal callus area.