Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Aug 24.
Published in final edited form as: Mol Cancer Res. 2008 May;6(5):695–705. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-07-0294

Table 1.

Nuclear Smad3 and N-Cadherin Expression in Benign Cystadenoma, Borderline Tumor, and Cystadenocarcinoma Tissue Microarrays

Frequency of Average Scores
P Total No. Patients
0 <1.5 ≥1.5
Smad3 0.031*
Benign 0 4 16 1.0 (benign versus borderline) 20
Borderline 0 6 24 0.0099 (borderline versus carcinoma) 30
Cystadenocarcinoma 0 20 19 0.0257 (benign versus carcinoma) 39
N-Cadherin 0.996*
Benign 2 12 5 0.0669 (benign versus borderline) 19
Borderline 5 24 1 0.773 (borderline versus carcinoma) 30
Cystadenocarcinoma 14 22 4 0.0319 (benign versus carcinoma) 40

NOTE: Pairwise contrast (logistic regression) between tissue categories are comparing (a) Smad3 average scores of <1.5 versus average scores of ≥1.5 and (b) N-cadherin average scores of 0 versus average scores of ≥1.5.

*

Cox proportional hazards regression analysis using Smad3 or N-cadherin as a continuous variable.