. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 May 1.

Published in final edited form as: Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2010 Apr 30;15(1):28–50. doi: 10.1177/1088868310366253

Table 3.

Intercorrelations among Internal Consistency Estimates across 30 NEO Facets.

Sample	2.	3.	4.	5.	6.	7.	8.
Indicator Samples
1. Manual (Form S)	.81^***	.62^***	.56^***	.65^***	.69^***	.49^**	.65^***
2. College (Form S)		.74^***	.70^***	.74^***	.62^***	.66^***	.82^***
3. PPOC (Form R)			.98^***	.99^***	.71^***	.82^***	.69^***
Additional Samples
4. PPOC Males (Form R)				.96^***	.67^***	.80^***	.63^***
5. PPOC Females (Form R)					.72^***	.80^***	.68^***
6. NEO-PI-R Adults (Form R)						.53^**	.50^**
7. NEO-PI-3 Adolescents (Form R)							.86^***
8. NEO-PI-3 Adolescents (Form S)

Note. Correlations across N = 30 facets. Data from sample sizes 1,539; 312; 12,156; 5,852; 6,304; 277; 500; and 500 for Samples 1 through 8, respectively.

^**

p < .01.

^***

p < .001.