Table 3.
Bivariate Association Between Mean Psychosocial Construct Scores and Mammography Follow-Up RAMS Study, 2003–2006
| Mean Psychosocial Construct Scores |
Inadequate Follow-up (n = 35) Mean (SD) |
Adequate Follow-up (n = 41) Mean (SD) |
OR*a (95% CI) Per unit decrement |
|---|---|---|---|
| Perceived Benefits | 5.79 (2.77) | 6.07(2.30) | 1.05 (0.87, 1.26) |
| Perceived Barriers | 83.24 (14.33) | 83.56 (14.69) | 0.99 (0.97, 1.03) |
| Perceived Susceptibility | 12.06 (3.51) | 10.98 (3.16) | 0.90 (0.78, 1.04) |
| Self-Efficacy | 8.63 (2.73) | 8.61 (2.45) | 0.99 (0.84, 1.19) |
| Cancer Fatalism | 52.50 (10.94) | 50.88 (10.76) | 1.04 (0.97,1.06) |
| Internal Health Locus of Control | 3.14 (0.43) | 3.98 (1.67) | 2.53 (1.20, 5.36) |
| External Health Locus of Control | 4.63 (2.16) | 4.28 (1.92) | 0.92 (0.73, 1.15) |
| Spiritual Health Locus of Controlb | 9.06 (3.89) | 9.60 (3.48) | 1.04 (0.92, 1.18) |
| Breast Cancer Knowledge | 4.80 (1.66) | 4.98 (1.60) | 1.07 (0.81, 1.42) |
| Breast Cancer Risk Knowledge | 4.77 (1.26) | 4.66 (1.24) | 0.93 (0.64, 1.34) |
*
p<.05
a
Odd ratios for being inadequate follow-up for every unit decrement in psychosocial factor scores.
b
Active and passive spiritual health locus of control are combined in this analysis.
OR = odds ratio
CI = confidence interval
SD = standard deviation