Table 2.
Genetic diversity indices for microsatellite and mitochondrial sequence data.
| Nμsat | HO ± sd | Aa ± sd | Ap | Ar | Nmt | HN | HP | π | Hd | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B. j. calurus | 178 | 0.68 ± 0.01 | 14.2 ± 10.3 | 34 | 6.9 | 122 | 14 | 8 | 0.0019 | 0.57 ± 0.003 |
| central California | 68 | 0.68 ± .01 | 11.4 ± 7.6 | 9 | 6.3 | 29 | 6 | 2 | 0.0012 | 0.43 ± 0.11 |
| Idaho | 35 | 0.66 ± 0.02 | 10.1 ± 6.3 | 5 | 6.5 | 34 | 6 | 2 | 0.0012 | 0.37 ± 0.10 |
| Nevada/Utah | 39 | 0.71 ± 0.02 | 11.2 ± 7.2 | 9 | 6.8 | 29 | 8 | 1 | 0.0016 | 0.57 ± 0.11 |
| southern California | 36 | 0.65 ± 0.02 | 9.6 ± 5.1 | 3 | 6.5 | 30 | 4 | 0 | 0.0009 | 0.35 ± 0.10 |
| B. j. borealis | 69 | 0.73 ± 0.01 | 12.1 ± 7.9 | 11 | 7.1 | 52 | 13 | 8 | 0.0019 | 0.520 ± .007 |
| Alberta | 2 | 0.79 ± 0.07 | 2.9 ± 1.1 | 0 | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Colorado | 11 | 0.73 ± 0.03 | 7.1 ± 3.4 | 1 | 6.6 | 6 | 1 | 0 | --- | --- |
| Kentucky | 9 | 0.72 ± 0.04 | 6.2 ± 2.5 | 0 | --- | 10 | 5 | 1 | 0.0022 | 0.67 ± 0.16 |
| Michigan | 5 | 0.76 ± 0.05 | 5.1 ± 2.0 | 1 | --- | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0.0023 | 0.70 ± 0.22 |
| north Texas | 9 | 0.73 ± 0.04 | 6.7 ± 3.4 | 1 | --- | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0.0008 | 0.33 ± 0.22 |
| Wisconsin | 33 | 0.73 ± 0.02 | 9.8 ± 5.3 | 5 | 6.6 | 26 | 8 | 5 | 0.0022 | 0.47 ± 0.12 |
| B. j. harlani | 24 | 0.69 ± 0.03 | 9.0 ± 5.3 | 5 | 6.9 | 24 | 5 | 0 | 0.016 | 0.59 ± 0.05 |
| B. jamaicensis spp. | ||||||||||
| melanistic migrants | 21 | 0.68 ± 0.03 | 9.0 ± 5.2 | 1 | 6.9 | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
Key: Nμsat = the number of samples for which microsatellite data was collected, HO = observed heterozygosity, Aa = average number of alleles per locus, Ap = number of private alleles, Ar = allelic richness averaged across 17 loci, Nmt = the number of samples for which sequence data was collected, HN = the number of haplotypes, HP = the number of private haplotypes, π = nucleotide diversity, Hd = haplotype diversity.