Table 5.
Characteristic | Practice Alpha | Practice Beta |
---|---|---|
Trust |
|
|
Mindfulness |
|
|
Heedfulness |
|
|
Respectful Interaction |
|
|
Diversity |
|
|
Social/Task Relatedness |
|
|
Rich/Lean Communication |
|
|
Practice Relationships Profile Summary | At Alpha, all practice members were given the responsibility and authority to do the work of the practice. Practice member input was seen as necessary for getting the work of Alpha done well. This culture was palpable in the front office and back office alike. Members of Alpha talked about mistakes. They freely self-organized around the work and were encouraged to do so as long as the work was accomplished well. People at Alpha used humor to relate with each other and to do their work. Alpha’s relationship system enabled a positive practice environment and facilitated high-quality health care. | Standardization of care delivery was an overarching goal for Beta. Beta management worked to dampen self-organization that did not fit with the formal rules, structures, and procedures of Beta. Nursing staff were regularly asked to rotate through teams to discourage ways of doing things that deviated from the way things were normally done at Beta. Because people at Beta could not self-organize openly, they found different, sometimes destructive, ways to self-organize. Beta’s push for standardization created an environment of care where practice relationships were lost and quality of care suffered. |
These vignettes represent composites of typical behaviors in the primary care practices that were examined in the DOPC, P&CD, STEP-UP, and ULTRA Studies (see Table 3). The Alpha and Beta practices are both fictional, Alpha representing an idealized example of a practice with good relationships and Beta an example of a practice with relationships that need improvement.