Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Attach Hum Dev. 2010 Sep;12(5):483–504. doi: 10.1080/14616734.2010.501983

Table 5.

Results of linear regression analyses testing improvement in reflective functioning and representation quality as predictors of improvement in caregiving behavior in MTP mothers after controlling for child age (n = 23)

Total Caregiving Total Contingency

R2 Δ ß a R2 Δ ß a
Reflective functioning
Mean RF .04* .20 .01 .12
Highest RF .16** .40 .16** .39
Lowest RF .11** .36 .07* .29
Representation quality
Coherence .00 -.03 .03* -.17
Sensitivity .10* .32 .04* .20
a

Standardized beta weights

small effect (r2 =.01)

*

medium effect (r2 =.06)

**

large effect (r2 =.14), (Cohen, 1988)