Figure - PMC

Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Nov 1.

Published in final edited form as: Nitric Oxide. 2010 Jun 12;23(3):199–205. doi: 10.1016/j.niox.2010.06.003

Fig. 2 — Quantitative analysis of NO^• and ONOO⁻ after UVB-irradiation. HaCaT cells were irradiated with UVB (75 mJ/cm²) in the absence or presence of L-NAME. At the indicated time-points post-UVB-irradiation, the cells were stained with DAF-2DA or DAR. The fluorescence intensity was then measured and corrected with respect to cell viability. The fluorescence intensities of (A) NO^• in the absence of L-NAME; (B) NO^• in the presence of L-NAME; (C) ONOO⁻ in the absence of L-NAME; and (D) ONOO⁻ in the presence of L-NAME were shown. The error bars present the standard deviations of 3 independent experiments. *: p<0.05 vs. control.

Fig. 2 — Quantitative analysis of NO^• and ONOO⁻ after UVB-irradiation. HaCaT cells were irradiated with UVB (75 mJ/cm²) in the absence or presence of L-NAME. At the indicated time-points post-UVB-irradiation, the cells were stained with DAF-2DA or DAR. The fluorescence intensity was then measured and corrected with respect to cell viability. The fluorescence intensities of (A) NO^• in the absence of L-NAME; (B) NO^• in the presence of L-NAME; (C) ONOO⁻ in the absence of L-NAME; and (D) ONOO⁻ in the presence of L-NAME were shown. The error bars present the standard deviations of 3 independent experiments. *: p<0.05 vs. control.