Skip to main content
. 2010 Sep;83(3):507–511. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2010.09-0685

Table 1.

Study area profile*

India 1 India 2 Nepal Bangladesh
Study area (district) Saran district, India Muzaffarpur district, India Saptari, Sunsari, Morang districts, Nepal Mymensinh district, Bangladesh
Active case detection (ACD) area Parsa PHC (Primary Health Center) Kurhani PHC Kanchanapur PHC Kanthal Union
Passive case detection (PCD) area Amnaur PHC Musahari PHC Kalyanpur PHC Moshakhali Union
Salient characteristics of study area Highly endemic; few public or private initiatives for VL prevention and control Highly endemic; well served by NGO (better public awareness activities and access to VL care) Low endemic; civil unrest limiting public health interventions Highly endemic; lower public awareness; poor PCD
Average family size 5.87 5.73 5.25 4.4
HH head without formal education (%) 45.2% 41.3% 56.3% 51.9%
Mean age in years (SD) 24.8 (18.7) 23.6 (18.5) 25.3 (17.8) 25.1 (18.7)
Sex distribution
Male (%) 53.6 53.4 50.9 51.4
Female (%) 46.4 46.6 49.1 48.6
Estimated VL prevalence (per 100,000) in district (surveillance data) 200–250 200–250 53–184 130–310
*

PHC = Primany Health Center; VL = visceral leishmaniasis; NGO = nongovernmental organization; HH = household head.