Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Sep 3.
Published in final edited form as: J Org Chem. 2010 Sep 3;75(17):5895–5903. doi: 10.1021/jo101043m

Table 3.

Assays of competitive binding of MSH(4), 11, 14, 15, and 16a–e to hMC4R.

Assay Aa Assay Bb

Compound Kic n Kic n
11 nbd 3 nbe 3
15 nbd 3 nbe 3
MSH(4) 1.9 ± 0.55 μM 5 0.76 ± 0.04 μM 4
14 2.7 ± 0.21 μM 5 0.82 ± 0.26 μM 3
16a ndf 1.7 ± 0.39 μM 4
16b ndf 1.2 ± 0.38 μM 6
16c ndf 0.84 ± 0.10 μM 4
16d ndf 0.52 ± 0.02 μM 6
16e 2.2 ± 0.17 μM 4 0.22 ± 0.06 μM 4
a

This assay employed probe 17.

b

This assay employed probe 18.

c

Ki values were calculated using the equation Ki = EC50/(1 + ([ligand]/KD)) where [ligand] refers to the concentration of probe used as the labeled competed ligand. For probe 17, [ligand] = 10 nM and KD = 18.8 nM. For probe 18, [ligand] = 0.5 μM and KD = 9.1 μM. The value given represents the average of n independent competition binding experiments, each done in quadruplicate.

d

This compound was unable to prevent probe 17 from binding in the concentration range tested (10−5–10−12 M in serine amide).

e

This compound was unable to prevent probe 18 from binding in the concentration range tested (10−5–10−12 M in serine amide).

f

Not determined.