Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jul 28.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Chem Soc. 2010 Jul 28;132(29):10093–10101. doi: 10.1021/ja102632p

Table 2.

EXAFS fitting parameters. Best fits are shown in bold

Sample/Fit Fa Cu-S Cu-N(His)b E0
Noc R (Å)d DW (Å2)e Noc R (Å)d DW (Å2)e
 WT
A 0.402 1 2.18 0.003 2 1.95 0.009 −0.763
Met121Cys
 pH5
 A 0.285 1 2.17 0.009 2 1.96 0.015 0.486
1 2.76 0.014
 B 0.326 1 2.17 0.007 2 1.93 0.014 0.326
Met121Cys
 pH7
A 0.165 1 2.17 0.008 2 1.95 0.020 0.370
1 2.74 0.012
 B 0.366 1 2.16 0.007 2 1.93 0.020 1.846
Met121HCy
A 0.388 1 2.22 0.014 2 1.97 0.012 −2.05
1 2.79 0.030
 B 0.486 1 2.20 0.014 2 1.96 0.012 −2.00
a

F is a least-squares fitting parameter defined as F2=1Ni=1Nk6(DataModel)2

b

Fits modeled histidine coordination by an imidazole ring, which included single and multiple scattering contributions from the second shell (C2/C5) and third shell (C3/N4) atoms respectively. The Cu-N-Cx angles were as follows: Cu-N-C2 126°, Cu-N-C3 -126°, Cu-N-N4 163°, Cu-N-C5 -163°.

c

Coordination numbers are generally considered accurate to ± 25%

d

In any one fit, the statistical error in bond-lengths is ±0.005 Å. However, when errors due to imperfect background subtraction, phase-shift calculations, and noise in the data are compounded, the actual error is probably closer to ±0.02 Å.

e

Debye-Waller factors are quoted as 2σ2