Table 3.
Sample (n) | Matsuki et al. [16] | Bonjoch et al. [12] | King et al. [10] | Layton et al. [7] |
---|---|---|---|---|
Raw sewage (3) | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 |
Sewage dilution 10−2 on .22 μm filter (3) |
0 | 2 | 3 | 2* |
Sewage dilution 10−3 on .22 μm filter (3) |
0 | 1 | 3 | 0 |
Sewage dilution 10−4 on .22 μm filter (3) |
0 | 0 | 3 | 0 |
Sewage dilution 10−1 on .45 μm filter (3) |
0 | 3 | 3 | 0 |
Sewage dilution 10−2 on .45 μm filter (3) |
0 | 3 | 3 | 0 |
Sewage dilution 10−3 on .45 μm filter (3) |
0 | 1 | 3 | 0 |
Sewage dilution 10−4 on .45 μm filter (3) |
0 | 1 | 3 | 0 |
Pig (8) | 0 | 3 | 0 | 6 |
Chicken (4) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Cow (2) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2* |
Rabbit (4) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Horse (4) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1* |
Detection limit was reached in 1/10,000 diluents of sewage.
*Very faint bands