Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Aug 4.
Published in final edited form as: Physiol Behav. 2010 May 9;101(1):132–140. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2010.04.030

Table 3.

Number of Subjects Showing Maximal Intake and Self-Reported Liking, Wanting and Sweetness of Test Solutions

Subject Group Aspartame Concentration in Solution Solution of Maximal Intake, #(%) of Subjects Solution of Maximal Liking, #(%) of Subjects Solution of Maximal Wanting*, #(%) of Subjects Solution of Maximal Sweetness, #(%) of Subjects
AN (N=24) 0% 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
0.01% 5 (21) 1 (4) 2 (9) 0 (0)
0.03% 6 (25) 5 (21) 4* (18) 0 (0)
0.08% 6 (25) 4 (17) 3* (14) 1 (4)
0.28% 7 (29) 14 (58) 13 (59) 23 (96)
NC (N=10) 0% 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (10) 0 (0)
0.01% 2 (20) 0 (0) 2 (20) 0 (0)
0.03% 1 (10) 2 (20) 0 (0) 0 (0)
0.08% 5 (50) 5 (50) 4 (40) 0 (0)
0.28% 2 (20) 3 (30) 3 (30) 10 (100)

Numbers indicate the number and percentage of subjects in each diagnostic group showing maximal intake and self-reported liking, wanting and sweetness for each of the five solutions, arranged in order of increasing aspartame concentration. Intake was determined by summing intake of each solution across the three trials and self-report measures were determined by averaging VAS measure of each variable across the three trials.

*

One subject with AN reported identical maximal wanting values to the 0.03% and the 0.08% solutions. The remaining AN subject reported zero values for wanting of all solutions and is not included in this table. Data from NC subjects have been previously published (1).

Reference List

1

Klein D, Schebendach J, Brown A, Smith G, Walsh BT. Modified sham feeding of sweet solutions in women with and without bulimia nervosa. Physiol Behav 2009;96:44–50.