Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2010 Jun 30;53(2):769–776. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.06.058

Figure 1. Approach, avoidance and escape contingencies and associated timing parameters.

Figure 1

The schematic shows each cue-response-outcome contingency employed and associated timing parameters. Distinct cues prompted approach responding that produced a future money gain, avoidance responding that prevented a future money loss and escape responding that terminated immediate escalating money loss. A neutral fixation cross (not shown) served as the baseline condition for imaging analyses. Pretraining using a contingency shaping procedure established stable and accurate responding during neuroimaging.