Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Oct 5.

Published in final edited form as: Physiol Behav. 2010 Jun 17;101(3):331–343. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2010.06.003

Table 3.

Analysis of the results in Fig. 2. We show F-ratios (df) from two-way ANOVAs, performed separately on each ingestive measure and strain.

Ingestive measure		Source of variation
Ingestive measure	Strain	Time	Sugar solution	Interaction
Intake	AKR	120.4 (1,28) ^*	27.3 (3,28) ^*	6.9 (3,28) ^*
	129P3	109.9 (1,27) ^*	41.8 (3,27) ^*	18.7 (3,27) ^*
	B6	117.2 (1,28) ^*	74.4 (3,28) ^*	3.9 (3,28) ^*
	FVB	71.4 (1,28) ^*	65.3 (3,28) ^*	1.9 (3,28)
Preference	AKR	20.8 (1,28) ^*	31.6 (3,28) ^*	3.8 (3,28) ^*
	129P3	3.4 (1,27) ^*	13.0 (3,27) ^*	1.2 (3,27)
	B6	< 0.1 (1,28)	42.5 (3,28) ^*	0.4 (3,28)
	FVB	< 0.1 (1,28)	37.4 (3,28) ^*	0.5 (3,28)

^*

P ≤ 0.05