Table 1.
Age | Hormone treatment | LH (ng/ml) | Progesterone (ng/ml) |
---|---|---|---|
Young | Vehicle/vehicle | 17.71 ± 1.92 (n = 8) | 8.97 ± 2.83 (n = 8) |
Oestradiol/vehicle | 8.37 ± 0.37 (n = 6) | 10.51 ± 2.73 (n = 8) | |
Oestradiol/progesterone | 8.00 ± 0.88 (n = 6) | 15.48 ± 2.34 (n = 7) | |
Middle-aged | Vehicle/vehicle | 8.34 ± 0.35 (n = 7) | 7.47 ± 1.02 (n = 7) |
Oestradiol/vehicle | 10.68 ± 1.58 (n = 8) | 10.75 ± 2.17 (n = 8) | |
Oestradiol/progesterone | 6.03 ± 0.24 (n = 7) | 15.51 ± 2.17 (n = 8) | |
Aged | Vehicle/vehicle | 3.27 ± 0.56 (n = 6) | 7.24 ± 1.36 (n = 10) |
Oestradiol/vehicle | 4.60 (n = 2) | 11.23 ± 2.46 (n = 6) | |
Oestradiol/progesterone | 3.28 ± 0.62 (n = 8) | 15.52 ± 7.33 (n = 8) |
Luteinising hormone (LH) values showed a main effect of age (P < 0.0001) and hormone treatment (P < 0.001), and a significant interaction (P < 0.001). Specifically, the young-vehicle/vehicle rats had significantly higher LH levels than all other groups (P < 0.005). Progesterone levels did not vary with age (P = 0.843), but were significantly different between steroid hormone treatments (P < 0.001), with levels significantly highest in the progesterone treated rats. Mean ± SEM are shown (except for the aged oestradiol/vehicle group for which serum samples of only two rats could be obtained for LH).