Skip to main content
. 2010 Aug 31;60(578):e366–e377. doi: 10.3399/bjgp10X515412

Table 6.

Studies giving a PPV of ≥5% in one or more strata of symptoms for urological cancer.

Stratification with PPV ≥5%
Study and NOQAS star rating Cancers Type Data Follow-up Age, years Sex Symptom or sign Sex Age, years Number with symptom PPV, %(95% CI)
Jones et al, 200712 (9 stars) Urethra, bladder, ureter and kidney Retrospective cohort Routinely recorded computer codes 3 years ≥15 M+F Haematuria computer codes M 55–64 1104 8.5 (6.9 to 10.3)

65–74 1517 11.2 (9.7 to 12.9)

75–84 1198 10.3 (8.6 to 12.1)

≥85 358 9.2 (6.4 to 12.7)

F 65–74 846 5.9 (4.4 to 7.7)

75–84 688 6.8 (5.1 to 9.0)

≥85 293 8.5 (5.6 to 12.3)

Bruyninckx et al, 200330 (7 stars) Any of the urological tract Prospective cohort Routinely registered 18–30 months Not given M+F Cases macroscopic haematuria M ≥60 Not given 22.1 (15.8 to 30.1)

F 40–59 Not given 6.4 (1.7 to 18.6)

≥60 Not given 8.3.(3.4 to 17.9)

Hamilton et al, 200631 (7 stars) Prostate Case-control Routinely recorded data including free text NA ≥40 M Rectal examination malignant M ≥40 Cases 5, controls 41 12.0 (5.0 to 37.0)

F = female. M = male. NA = not applicable. NOQAS = Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scales. PPV = positive predictive value.