Skip to main content
. 2010 Sep;71(5):786–794. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2010.71.786

Table 3.

Hierarchical regression analyses for associations between alcohol consumption and BNP levels in HF patients and non-HF controls

Variables entered Standardized β coefficient t P R2 change
BNP baseline levels
 Group (HF vs. controls) .62 (.37)a 4.8(1.8)a <.001 (.09)a .38 (.05)a
 Drinks per month .22 (.27)a 1.7(2.0)a .10 (.06)a .05 (.09)a
 Group by drinks per monthb .18 (.24)a 1.2(1.8)a .23 (.08)a .03 (.05)a
BNP stress change
 Group (HF vs. controls) .32 (.32)a 2.6(1.7)a .015 (.11)a .10 (.04)a
 Drinks per month .61 (.56)a 4.9 (4.4)a <.001 (<.001)a .37 (.28)a
 Group × Drinks per Monthb .49 (.45)a 4.3 (4.6)a <.001 (<.001)a .19 (.18)a

Notes: BNP stress change = difference between post-stress level and baseline. BNP = biomarker B-type natriuretic peptide; HF = heart failure.

a

After controlling for age, mean arterial pressure, and meters walked in the 6-minute walk test;

b

regression results for the interaction of Group × Drinks per Month after controlling for group and drinks per month.