Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Aug 31.
Published in final edited form as: Odontology. 2010 Feb 16;98(1):37–43. doi: 10.1007/s10266-009-0109-4

Table 2.

Tensile bond strength (MPa) and failure modes

One Up Bond F Plus
Adper Prompt L Pop
Saliva Control SA AS ASW ASWA Control SA AS ASW ASWA
Nonsmoker’s 21.7 (4.4) 19.6 (5.5) 23.1 (5.6) 15.3 (5.6) 20.8 (4.1) 10.8 (2.2) 9.3 (3.7) 8.1 (2.1) 8.3 (2.3) 14.5 (3.7)
A (85%) A (80%) A (79%) A (100%) A (60%) A (100%) A (95%) A (100%) A (100%) A (90%)
C-CR (15%) C-CR (20%) C-CR (21%) C-CR (40%) C-CR (5%) C-CR (10%)
Smoker’s 21.7 (4.4) 22.2 (4.5) 20.1 (5.5) 23.1 (4.4) 24.1 (5.0) 10.8 (2.2) 10.4 (4.8) 9.3 (3.0) 9.2 (3.5) 13.4 (4.1)
A (85%) A (61%) A (92%) A (94%) A (67%) A (100%) A (100%) A (100%) A (100%) A (80%)
C-CR (15%) C-CR (39%) C-CR (8%) C-CR (6%) C-CR (33%) C-CR (20%)

Tensile bond strength values are means (SD), n = 8

Fisher’s protected least significant differences (P = 0.05) intervals for critical adhesive, saliva, and surface condition differences were 1.3, 1.3, and 2.1 MPa, respectively

SA, saliva/air dry/adhesive; AS, adhesive/saliva/air dry; ASW, adhesive/saliva/water rinse/air dry; ASWA, adhesive/saliva/water rinse/air dry/adhesive; A, adhesive failure; C-CR, cohesive resin in composite resin