Table 2. Confirmatory factor analysis model fit result.
df | MLR χ2 | CFI | TLI | RMSEA | SRMR | AIC | Δdf | Δχ2 | p | |
Bodmer's original structure | ||||||||||
CFA (simple structure) | 2076 | 6661.7 | .709 | .699 | .061 | .094 | 363480 | |||
CFA with method effects | 2069 | 6190.6 | .738 | .729 | .058 | .089 | 362819 | 7 | 393 | <.001 |
ESEM | 1950 | 5469.9 | .777 | .754 | .055 | .050 | 150706 | 119 | 670 | <.001 |
ESEM with method effects | 1943 | 5235.3 | .791 | .769 | .054 | .054 | 150103 | 7 | 37 | <.001 |
Bifactor model | 2013 | 5487.6 | .779 | .765 | .054 | .086 | 150545 | −70 | −223 | |
Bifactor model with method effects | 2006 | 5116.9 | .803 | .789 | .051 | .095 | 150061 | 7 | 942 | <.001 |
OBN factor alone | 324 | 1643.7 | .785 | .767 | .083 | .070 | 64550 | |||
DED factor alone | 189 | 612.5 | .834 | .815 | .062 | .070 | 42944 | |||
VRS factor alone | 135 | 1199.5 | .689 | .648 | .116 | .090 | 45175 | |||
Model revision | ||||||||||
Initial ICLUST solution (47 items) | 2016.0 | .907 | .897 | .042 | .059 | 255679 | ||||
Final model (42 items) | 1430.8 | .929 | .921 | .038 | .052 | 94687 | ||||
MIMIC models | ||||||||||
Final model: MIMIC without DIF | 1780.6 | .918 | .904 | .040 | .050 | 97624 | ||||
Final model: MIMIC with DIF | 1668.3 | .928 | .915 | .038 | .048 | 97489 | 9 | 120 | <.001 |
Note. MLR = maximum-likelihood-robust estimator; CFI = comparative fit index; TLI = Tucker-Lewis index; RMSEA = root mean square error of approximation; SRMR = standardized root-mean-square residual; AIC = Akaike's information criterion; Δχ2 = Satorra-Bentler scaled χ2 difference; CFA = confirmatory factor analysis; ESEM = exploratory structural equation model; OBN = oceanic boundlessness; DED = dread of ego dissolution; VRS = visionary restructuralization; ICLUST = hierarchical item-clustering; MIMIC = multiple indicators multiple causes; DIF = differential item functioning.