. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Apr 1.

Published in final edited form as: Community Ment Health J. 2010 Mar 25;47(2):143–155. doi: 10.1007/s10597-010-9302-8

Table 5.

Attitudes and method specific efficacy for female and male condoms at three time points

Treatment group	Baseline		3-month follow-up		6-month follow-up

	Mean (SD)	N	Mean (SD)	N	Mean (SD)	N
Female condom attitudes and method specific efficacy (range 1–4)
HIV	2.798 (.341)	39	2.930 (.327)	35	2.868 (.344)	35
Control	2.801 (.353)	40	2.778 (.417)	32	2.774 (.377)	34
Male condom attitudes and method specific efficacy (range 1–4)
HIV	3.025 (.392)	39	2.988 (.348)	35	2.965 (.297)	35
Control	2.936 (.342)	40	2.972 (.377)	32	2.912 (.361)	34

Higher means indicate more positive attitudes and perceived efficacy