. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Sep 1.

Published in final edited form as: Neuropsychology. 2007 Mar;21(2):263–273. doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.21.2.263

Table 3.

Neuropsychological Performance Effect sizes at Follow-up by Baseline Diagnostic Status

	No covariates			Demographic and comorbidity set^a			Full set^b
	Effect Sizes (ES)			Effect Sizes (ES)			Effect Sizes (ES)
	0–1	0–2	1–2	0–1	0–2	1–2	0–1	0–2	1–2

WISC-III Digits Forward	.44	.66	.22	.35	.52	.16	.25	.40	.15
WISC-III Digits Backward	.42	.65	.22	.26	.38	.12	.07	.19	.13
CPT percent omissions (rev)^c	.48	.44	.04	.32	.16	.16	.19	.04	.15
CPT percent commissions (rev)^c	.47	.33	.13	.45	.22	.23	.45	.18	.27
TCFT error proportion score (rev)^c	.52	.59	.07	.50	.45	.05	.31	.26	.04
RAN correct minus incorrect	.34	.62	.28	.21	.31	.10	.20	.29	.09
UL gestalt correct minus incorrect	.62	.44	.18	.72	.42	.30	.43	.12	.31
UL fsbm correct minus incorrect	.52	.61	.09	.53	.54	.01	.45	.46	.01

Note. 0 = Comparison, 1 = Inattentive, 2 = Combined; ES = Effect size, calculated as Cohen’s d; WISC-III = Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, 3^rd edition; CPT = Continuous Performance Test; RAN = Rapid Naming Test; UL = Underlining Test.

Covariates included baseline family income, child age, reading disorder, disruptive disorder, and internalizing disorder.

Covariates included demographic and comorbidity set plus child Full Scale IQ.

Reversed scored so that for all variables higher means indicate better performance.