. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Sep 1.

Published in final edited form as: Neuropsychology. 2007 Mar;21(2):263–273. doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.21.2.263

Table 4.

Neuropsychological Performance at Follow-up by Follow-up Diagnostic Status

	No ADHD			Inattentive			Combined			F	p^a
	N	M	(SD)	N	M	(SD)	N	M	(SD)	F	p^a

WISC-III Digits Forward	115	9.7^a	2.1	47	8.2^b	2.3	38	7.9^b	2.0	14.33	.000
WISC-III Digits Backward	115	6.0^a	1.9	47	5.3^a	1.9	38	5.2^a	2.1	3.48	.033
CPT percent omissions (rev)^b	107	96.5^a	6.2	46	94.6^a,^b	9.7	33	92.7^b	9.4	3.30	.039
CPT percent commissions (rev)^b	107	62.0^a	20.7	46	54.5^a	24.0	33	56.1^a	23.6	2.23	.110
TCFT error proportion score (rev)^b	111	.82^a	.09	47	.78^a	.10	38	.72^b	.14	10.78	.000
RAN correct minus incorrect	112	1.9^a	.4	46	1.7^b	.4	39	1.6^b	.4	7.07	.001
UL gestalt correct minus incorrect	114	20.3^a	7.8	47	15.4^b	7.1	39	15.7^b	6.2	10.21	.000
UL fsbm correct minus incorrect	114	14.1^a	3.8	47	11.8^b	4.8	39	11.5^b	4.3	8.19	.000

Note. 0 = Comparison, 1=Inattentive, 2 = Combined; WISC-III = Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, 3^rd edition; CPT = Continuous Performance Test; RAN = Rapid Naming Test; UL = Underlining Test.

Significance based on one-way analyses of variance following significant omnibus multivariate analyses of variance (see text). In a given row, means with different subscripts differ significantly on the basis of Tukey’s post hoc comparisons.

Reversed scored so that for all variables higher means indicate better performance.