Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuropsychology. 2007 Mar;21(2):263–273. doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.21.2.263

Table 5.

Neuropsychological Performance Effect sizes at Follow-up by Follow-up Diagnostic Status

No covariates Full setb
0–1 0–2 1–2 0–1 0–2 1–2

Digits Forward 0.66 0.79 0.13 0.50 0.66 0.16
Digits Backward 0.34 0.41 0.07 0.20 0.28 0.08
CPT omissions (rev)c 0.24 0.48 0.24 0.14 0.42 0.28
CPT commissions (rev)c 0.34 0.27 0.07 0.16 0.07 0.23
TCFT error proportion (rev)c 0.31 0.82 0.51 0.17 0.64 0.48
RAN 0.50 0.55 0.05 0.50 0.48 0.02
UL gestalt 0.63 0.60 0.04 0.72 0.68 0.05
UL fsbm 0.52 0.60 0.08 0.42 0.34 0.06

Note. 0 = No ADHD, 1 = Inattentive, 2 = Combined

a

Covariates included follow–up family income, child age, reading disorder, disruptive disorder, and internalizing disorder.

b

Covariates included demographic and comorbidity set plus baseline child Full Scale IQ.

c

Reversed scored so that for all variables higher means indicate better performance.