Skip to main content
. 2010 Aug 11;107(35):15421–15426. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1004809107

Table 1.

Comparison of the experimentally determined and predicted values of a and γ for different fragments

Fragment Exp. a, nm Predicted a from elemental set 2 Predicted a from elemental set 1 Exp. γ, bp/turn Predicted γ from elemental set 2 Predicted γ from elemental set 1
HPL1 48.5 52.2 10.43 10.47
LPL1 48.0 39.5 10.53 10.45
HPL2 54.0 55.7 49.7 10.42 10.40 10.46
LPL2 45.5 43.9 45.8 10.58 10.55 10.48
λ DNA frag. 48.0 48.4 47.2 10.50 10.49 10.48
IS 49.5 49.4 45.8 10.50 10.49 10.48
SG1 48.5 49.1 46.1 10.455 10.46 10.47
602 47.9 48.5 46.6

The predictions are based on elemental sets 1 and 2 of 8 and 11 fragments, correspondingly. The measured values for λ DNA and IS (intrinsically straight) fragments were taken from ref. 3. The value of the bending rigidity for Widom’s fragment 602 (48), expressed over a in the table, was determined by fitting the computed j factor to the measurement assuming 11° and 15° bend angles in two A tracts of the fragment. The computations followed the procedure described in ref. 49.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure