Table 1.
Comparison of the experimentally determined and predicted values of a and γ for different fragments
Fragment | Exp. a, nm | Predicted a from elemental set 2 | Predicted a from elemental set 1 | Exp. γ, bp/turn | Predicted γ from elemental set 2 | Predicted γ from elemental set 1 |
HPL1 | 48.5 | — | 52.2 | 10.43 | — | 10.47 |
LPL1 | 48.0 | — | 39.5 | 10.53 | — | 10.45 |
HPL2 | 54.0 | 55.7 | 49.7 | 10.42 | 10.40 | 10.46 |
LPL2 | 45.5 | 43.9 | 45.8 | 10.58 | 10.55 | 10.48 |
λ DNA frag. | 48.0 | 48.4 | 47.2 | 10.50 | 10.49 | 10.48 |
IS | 49.5 | 49.4 | 45.8 | 10.50 | 10.49 | 10.48 |
SG1 | 48.5 | 49.1 | 46.1 | 10.455 | 10.46 | 10.47 |
602 | 47.9 | 48.5 | 46.6 | — | — | — |
The predictions are based on elemental sets 1 and 2 of 8 and 11 fragments, correspondingly. The measured values for λ DNA and IS (intrinsically straight) fragments were taken from ref. 3. The value of the bending rigidity for Widom’s fragment 602 (48), expressed over a in the table, was determined by fitting the computed j factor to the measurement assuming 11° and 15° bend angles in two A tracts of the fragment. The computations followed the procedure described in ref. 49.