Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Sep 2.
Published in final edited form as: Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2009 Dec 14;3(1):97–105. doi: 10.1161/CIRCGENETICS.109.894527

Table 5.

Reclassification for CAC score >300 for men comparing Model 2 (GCRP variables plus dichotomous family history) and Model 3 (GCRP variables plus familial risk stratification)

Model 2 Model 3
Number (percent)
Low
probability
(<5%)		 Intermediate
probability
(5-25%)		 High
probability
(>25%)		 Total
Number
Participants with CAC >300
 Low probability (<5%) 7(63.6) 4(36.4) 0 11
 Intermediate probability (5-25%) 2(0.9) 169(80.1) 40(19.0) 211
 High probability (>25%) 0 21(7.1) 276(92.9) 297
 Total number 9 194 316 519
Participants with CAC ≤300
 Low probability (<5%) 444(91.4) 42(8.6) 0 486
 Intermediate probability (5-25%) 51(3.7) 1,252(91.5) 65(4.8) 1,368
 High probability (>25%) 0 52(10.1) 461(89.9) 513
 Total 495 1,346 526 2,367

GCRP, general cardiovascular risk profile; CAC, coronary artery calcium