Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Sep 6.
Published in final edited form as: Future Oncol. 2009 Dec;5(10):1555–1584. doi: 10.2217/fon.09.121

Table 4.

Pre- and post-operative prediction of biochemical recurrence at 2–10 years in men treated with radical prostatectomy

Reference Year Prediction form Biochemical recurrence, years No of Patients Variables Discrimination Validation
Pre-operative
Snow et al. [17] 1994 Neural network Not available 240 Age, PSA, clinical stage, biopsy Gleason grade, potency 90% Not performed
Kattan et al. [12] 1998 Probability nomogram development 5 983 Biopsy primary and secondary Gleason grade, clinical stage, PSA Internal: 74%
External: 65–83%
Internal and external [30, 72, 73, 159]
D’Amico et al. [15] 1999 Probability table 2 892 Biopsy Gleason sum, clinical stage, PSA Not available Internal
Graefen et al. [160] 1999 Probability graph 3.5 315 Biopsy Gleason sum, number of positive cores, PSA Not available Not performed
D’Amico et al. [16] 2000 Probability graph 2 977 Biopsy Gleason sum, endorectal coil magnetic resonance imaging T-stage, PSA, percent positive biopsy cores Not available Internal
Tewari et al. [161] 2001 Neural network 3.5 1400 Age, race, PSA, clinical staging, biopsy Gleason sum 83% Not performed
D’Amico et al. [13, 14] 1998, 2002 Probability graph 4 823 Biopsy Gleason sum, clinical stage, PSA, percent positive biopsy cores 80% Internal and external [72, 162]
Cooperberg et al. [163] 2005 Probability graph 3 and 5 1439 Age, PSA, biopsy Gleason sum, clinical stage, percent positive biopsy Internal: 66%
External: 68–81%
Internal and external [164, 165]
Stephenson et al. [37] 2006 Probability nomogram development 10 1978 and 1545 PSA, clinical stage, biopsy Gleason sum, year of surgery, number of positive and negative cores 76–79% Internal and external
Post-operative
Bauer et al. [166] 1998 Probability formula 5 378 Race, PSA, Gleason sum, organ confined status Not available External [167]
D’Amico et al. [13] 1998 Probability graph 2 862 Pathologic stage, PSA, Gleason sum, surgical margin status Not available Not performed
Graefen et al. [160] 1999 Probability graph 3.5 318 Pathologic stage, volume Gleason grade 4/5 Not available Not performed
Potter et al. [168] 1999 Neural network 5 214 Gleason sum, extraprostatic extension, surgical margin status, age, DNA ploidy, and quantitative nuclear grade 94% Internal
Kattan et al. [11] 1999 Probability nomogram development 5 996 PSA, Gleason sum, extracapsular extension, seminal vesicle invasion, lymph node invasion, surgical margin status Internal: 89%
External: 77–83%
Internal and external [74, 78, 169]
Stamey et al. [170] 2000 Probability formula Unknown 326 PSA, percent Gleason grade 4/5, volume largest cancer, vascular invasion, prostate weight, percent intraductal cancer, lymph node invasion Not available Not performed
McAleer et al. [171] 2005 Probability graph 7 2417 Gleason grade, stage, margin status, dichotomized PSA (cut point 10 ng/mL). Not available Internal
Stephenson et al. [36] 2005 Probability nomogram development 10 1881, 1782, and 1357 PSA, Gleason sum, extracapsular extension, seminal vesicle invasion, lymph node invasion, surgical margin status 78–86% Internal and external
Suardi et al. [36] 2008 Probability nomogram development 5, 10, 15, and 20 601 (develop ment), 2963 and 3178 (external) Gleason sum, pathologic stage, surgical margin status, type of surgery, adjuvant radiotherapy Internal: 77–81%
External: 77–86%
Internal and external
HHS Vulnerability Disclosure