. 2010 Jan 12;33(5):943–948. doi: 10.1007/s00270-009-9793-2

Table 2.

Baseline of 71 patients and follow-up MR findings of 70 patients with a large fibroid burden treated with uterine artery embolization, including results per subgroup

Group	Dominant fibroid diameter (cm; mean and range)		Dominant fibroid diameter reduction (%)	Dominant fibroid volume (cm³; mean and range)		Dominant fibroid volume reduction (%)	Uterine volume (cm³; mean and range)		Uterine volume reduction (%)	Fibroid infarction rate (mean and range)
Group	Baseline	Follow-up		Baseline	Follow-up		Baseline	Follow-up		Dominant	Overall
A (N = 12): >10 cm, <700 cm³	10.6	7.7	27	379	177	53	591	385	35	90%	80%
A (N = 12): >10 cm, <700 cm³	10–13	6.4–9.5		297–547	68–254		471–691	225–621		40–100%	50–100%
B (N = 30): >10 cm, >700 cm³	12.6	9.4	25	723	353	51	1358	760	44	85%	85%
B (N = 30): >10 cm, >700 cm³	10–16	6.0–13.4		417–1265	79–1127		788–3037	134–1796		20–100%	20–100%
C (N = 29): <10 cm, >700 cm³	7.9	6.5	18	199	131	34	1105	20	45	90%	90%
C (N = 29): <10 cm, >700 cm³	4.3–9.6	3.4–9.6		42–424	18–343		653–1855	58–1526		40–100%	50–100%
All (N = 71)	10.3	8	22	450	233	44	1125	639	43	86%	87%
All (N = 71)	4.3–16	3.4–13.4		42–1265	18–1127		471–3037	58–1796		20–100%	20–100%