Skip to main content
. 2010 Jul 6;54(9):3625–3629. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01397-09

TABLE 1.

Antibiotic susceptibility of P. aeruginosa in the presence or absence of 32 μg/ml of ME1071

Organism (no. of isolates tested) and antibiotic ME1071a MIC (μg/ml)
% Sa % Ra
Range MIC50 MIC90
MBL-producing P. aeruginosa (174)
    Piperacillin 0.5->128 >128 >128 34 66
+ 1->128 128 >128 37 63
    Ceftazidime 2->64 >64 >64 6 94
+ 2->64 32 >64 33 53
    Aztreonam 0.25->128 32 128 9 63
+ 0.5->128 32 128 8 64
    Imipenem 0.5->64 >64 >64 8 88
+ 0.5->64 16 >64 17 75
    Meropenem 0.5->64 >64 >64 6 86
+ 0.25->64 16 >64 14 72
    Biapenem 0.12->64 >64 >64 7 86
+ 0.12->64 8 >64 22 40
    Doripenem 0.25->64 >64 >64 8 80
+ 0.25->64 8 >64 20 50
Non-MBL-producing P. aeruginosa (16)
    Piperacillin 4->128 >128 >128 19 81
+ 4->128 >128 >128 25 75
    Ceftazidime 2->64 16 64 25 50
+ 2->64 16 64 25 44
    Aztreonam 4->128 32 >128 13 56
+ 4->128 32 >128 13 56
    Imipenem 1-32 16 32 13 88
+ 1-32 16 32 13 81
    Meropenem 0.12-64 16 64 25 56
+ 0.25-64 16 64 19 56
    Biapenem 0.5-32 16 32 13 69
+ 0.5-32 16 32 13 63
    Doripenem 0.25-32 8 32 31 44
+ 0.25-32 8 32 38 44
IMP-1-producing P. aeruginosa (166)
    Piperacillin 0.5->128 >128 >128 34 66
+ 1->128 128 >128 37 63
    Ceftazidime 2->64 >64 >64 7 93
+ 2->64 32 >64 33 52
    Aztreonam 0.25->128 32 128 7 64
+ 0.5->128 32 128 7 64
    Imipenem 0.5->64 >64 >64 8 87
+ 0.5->64 16 >64 17 75
    Meropenem 0.5->64 >64 >64 6 86
+ 0.25->64 16 >64 13 72
    Biapenem 0.12->64 >64 >64 8 86
+ 0.12->64 8 32 22 38
    Doripenem 0.25->64 >64 >64 8 80
+ 0.25->64 8 >64 20 49
VIM-2-producing P. aeruginosa (8)
    Piperacillin 64->128 128 >128 38 63
+ 16->128 128 >128 38 63
    Ceftazidime 32->64 64 >64 0 100
+ 4->64 32 >64 38 63
    Aztreonam 8-128 16 128 38 50
+ 8->128 32 >128 38 63
    Imipenem 16->64 >64 >64 0 100
+ 2->64 64 >64 13 75
    Meropenem 16->64 >64 >64 0 100
+ 1->64 32 >64 25 75
    Biapenem 8->64 64 >64 0 75
+ 0.25->64 16 >64 25 75
    Doripenem 16->64 64 >64 0 100
+ 1->64 16 >64 25 63
a

Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) (2010) breakpoints, where available (1), were used. CLSI (2010) does not have criteria (susceptible, intermediate, or resistant) for biapenem or doripenem (1). For comparison only, the same values for imipenem (CLSI, 2010) were used as criteria for biapenem and doripenem. S, susceptible; R, resistant.