Skip to main content
. 2010 Jun 28;54(9):3756–3762. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01409-09

TABLE 3.

Rate of carriage switching of S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae between two consecutive samples

Sequence of test results Trial arm No. of occurrences Pa Total person-years from first to second tests Rateb P (placebo vs CoT)c
S. pneumoniae
    No carriage→no carriage Placebo 77 0.53 52.0 1.48 0.10
CoT 94 0.47 77.9 1.21
    No carriage→carriage Placebo 68 0.47 52.0 1.31 0.61
CoT 108 0.53 77.9 1.39
    Carriage→no carriage Placebo 78 0.43 67.7 1.15 0.44
CoT 94 0.42 90.0 1.04
    Carriage→carriage Placebo 105 0.57 67.7 1.55 0.50
CoT 131 0.58 90.0 1.46
H. influenzae
    No carriage→no carriage Placebo 168 0.73 82.4 2.04 0.67
CoT 237 0.77 119.5 1.98
    No carriage→carriage Placebo 62 0.27 82.4 0.75 0.12
CoT 71 0.23 119.5 0.59
    Carriage→no carriage Placebo 71 0.73 36.8 1.93 0.02
CoT 71 0.60 47.2 1.51
    Carriage→carriage Placebo 26 0.27 36.8 0.71 0.11
CoT 47 0.40 47.2 1.00
a

That is, the probability of a subsequent test result being carriage versus no carriage conditional on the first test result.

b

The rate column normalizes probabilities to total person-time at risk between tests, which differs between groups because of higher survival rates associated with CoT treatment.

c

Calculated using cause-specific hazards for subsequent test result being carriage versus no carriage. A global test for differences between placebo and CoT across all four sequences for S. pneumoniae was performed (P = 0.18). A global test for differences between placebo and CoT across all four sequences for H. influenzae was performed (P = 0.04).