Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Sep 7.
Published in final edited form as: J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2006 Dec;34(6):825–839. doi: 10.1007/s10802-006-9062-7

Table 3.

Effects of Peer Rejection and ADHD on Changes in Adjustment

Dependent variable: Follow-up externalizing behavior
Variable Total R2 R2 change B S.E.B β

1. Baseline externalizing behavior .31 31*** .40 .07 .56
2. Childhood peer rejection .32 .00 −.04 .15 −.05
3. Childhood ADHD diagnosis .32 .01 .14 .12 .11
4. Interaction between 2 and 3 .32 .00 −.07 .16 −.07

Dependent variable: Follow-up internalizing behavior
Variable Total R2 R2 change B S.E.B β

1. Baseline internalizing behavior .29 29*** .42 .05 .54
2. Childhood peer rejection .29 .00 −.01 .06 −.01
3. Childhood ADHD diagnosis .29 .00 .02 .09 .02
4. Interaction between 2 and 3 .29 .00 .11 .16 .11

Dependent variable: Follow-up academic achievement
Variable Total R2 R2 change B S.E.B β

1. Baseline academic achievement .67 67*** .83 .04 .82
2. Childhood peer rejection .69 .02** −.2.43 .78 −.13
3. Childhood ADHD diagnosis .70 .02** −4.87 1.39 −.17
4. Interaction between 2 and 3 .71 .00 −2.21 2.46 −.09
*

p<.05;

**

p<.01;

***

p<.001

R2 change effect size conventions: .01 = small, .06 = medium, .14 = large (Cohen et al., 2003)