Skip to main content
. 2010 Sep 4;26(18):i618–i624. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq396

Table 2.

Best 20 candidates of the prioritization (evaluation via similar phenotypes) of the chromosome X genes resequenced by Tarpey et al. (2009) (see also Supplementary Table S2)

Rank Gene Entrez ID Disorder Mut. score Score sc
1 BRWD3 254 065 XLMR 2.86 7.16e-78
2 IRAK1 3654 1.94 1.84e-71
3 SYP 6855 XLMR 8.97e-69
4 BIRC4 331 other 37.04 4.28e-68
5 MAGED1 9500 5.14 5.63e-68
6 MORF4L2 9643 3.37e-66
7 ZNF280C 55 609 5.07e-65
8 SYN1 6853 XLMR 1.15e-64
9 CXorf6 10 046 other 12.00 1.19e-64
10 ATP6AP2 10 159 XLMR 2.70e-64
11 HCFC1 3054 27.82 1.65e-61
12 PJA1 64 219 2.44 1.82e-61
13 NGFRAP1 27 018 1.91e-61
14 FAM50A 9130 11.62 5.63e-61
15 HUWE1 10 075 XLMR 46.75 1.62e-60
16 GRIA3 2892 XLMR 13.00 1.14e-59
17 PIGA 5277 other 3.24e-59
18 OGT 8473 15.90 4.15e-59
19 GNL3L 54 552 22.49 1.68e-58
20 WDR40C 340 578 0.22 3.35e-58

Associations to disorders and mutation scores are as reported by Tarpey et al. Mutation scores reflect the conservation scores at missense positions and are summed over the single missense mutations found for each gene. Genes in bold face overlap with those in Table 3.