Table 2. Outbreeding effects on tolerance to snail and artificial damage.
Source | DF | F | P | |
a) Artificial damage | Initial # leaves | 1 | 34.65 | 0.0001 |
Number of Fruits | Population | 18 | 1.61 | 0.0526 |
Cross | 1 | 1.75 | 0.1859 | |
Artificial damage | 1 | 1.00 | 0.3172 | |
Family(Population) | 129 | 2.48 | 0.0001 | |
Population × Cross | 11 | 1.14 | 0.3278 | |
Population × Artificial damage | 17 | 0.61 | 0.8827 | |
Artificial damage × Cross | 1 | 1.58 | 0.2088 | |
Population × Cross × Artificial damage | 11 | 1.13 | 0.3367 | |
Artificial damage × Family(Population) | 128 | 0.81 | 0.9350 | |
Residual | 757 | |||
b) Snail damage | Initial # leaves | 1 | 19.67 | 0.0001 |
Number of Fruits | Population | 18 | 2.92 | 0.0001 |
Cross | 1 | 0.18 | 0.6734 | |
Family(population) | 131 | 2.51 | 0.0001 | |
Damage by snails (%) | 1 | 11.42 | 0.0008 | |
Population × Cross | 11 | 1.89 | 0.0377 | |
Population × Damage by snails (%) | 18 | 1.98 | 0.0377 | |
Cross × Damage by snails (%) | 1 | 0.26 | 0.6072 | |
Population × Cross × Damage by snails (%) | 11 | 2.37 | 0.0070 | |
Family(population) × Damage by snails (%) | 129 | 1.08 | 0.2807 | |
Residual | 809 |
ANCOVA summary of a) effects of populations, cross (with or between population outbreeding) and artificial damage (clipped and sprayed versus undamaged) on the number fruits produced after damage in our artificial-damage experiment and b) effects of populations, cross, family and level of snail damage on the number of fruits produced after damage in our snail herbivory experiment.