Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Sci. 2009 Oct 30;20(11):1364–1372. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02460.x

Table 2.

Confusion Matrix for the Support Vector Machine Analyses

Predicted task
True task Risk taking Classification Rhyme judgments Working memory Gambling decisions Semantic judgments Reading aloud Response inhibition Accuracy
Risk taking 14 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 87.50%
Classification 0 18 0 0 0 0 1 1 90.00%
Rhyme judgments 1 2 8 0 1 1 0 0 61.54%
Working memory 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 3 82.35%
Gambling decisions 0 3 0 0 11 2 0 0 68.75%
Semantic judgments 0 2 0 0 1 11 0 0 78.57%
Reading aloud 0 1 0 0 0 0 17 1 89.47%
Response inhibition 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 11 73.33%

Note. The table presents results obtained using leave-one-out cross-validation. The numbers in each row indicate how many subjects were classified as performing each task when they were actually performing the task indicated by the row label.