Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Sep 14.
Published in final edited form as: Biochemistry. 2010 Sep 14;49(36):7902–7912. doi: 10.1021/bi1009375

Table 8.

Comparison of Second-Order Rate Constants for Reactions of Hperoxo and Q with Substrates

Substratea Species kobs (M-1 s-1)b kperoxo/kQ D(R+H-) (kcal/mol)c -ΔGhydride (R+)s (kcal/mol)d D(RH) (kcal/mol)
(CH3CH2)2Oe Hperoxo 17 ± 1
Q 2.2 ± 1 7.7 214 94.8 89.0f
CH3CH2CHO Hperoxo 85.5 ± 0.1
Q 14.10 ± 0.02 6.06 224 103.8 87.5g
CH3CHO Hperoxo 110.08 ± 0.03
Q 81.7 ± 0.1 1.35 231.4 110.5 94.3f
CH3CH2OH Hperoxo 12.13 ± 0.01
Q 35.7 ± 0.1 0.34 231.9 110.9 94.6f
CH3OH Hperoxo 2.4 ± 0.6
Q 218 ± 8 0.011 255 131.8 96.1f
a

D(R+H-) and D(RH) are given for the bolded C–H bond.

b

Second-order rate constants for Class III substrates are given by the measured kinit values. Only Class III substrates for which kinit values were discretely measured by collecting >5 data points at low substrate concentration in the linear region of the curve are shown.

c

Data from (64).

d

Calculated using -ΔGhydride (R+)s = 0.904D(R+H-) – 98.7 kcal/mol from (65). This relationship was originally derived for aromatic molecules in acetonitrile and DMSO, but should provide a good approximation for non-aromatic systems in aqueous solution.

e

Data from (26).

f

Data from (47).

g

Data from (66).