Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Environ Res. 2010 Jun 20;110(6):595–603. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2010.06.001

Table 1.

Characteristics of the Participants at Delivery and First Follow-up Visit, Tapachula, Chiapas, Mexico 2002-2005

Follow-up status
At least one follow-up visit
Characteristics Followed
(n=788)
%
Lost to follow-up
(n=81)
%
P
valuea
One visit
(n=39)
%
2+ visits
(n=749)
%
P
valuea
    Maternal
Age at childbirth (y)b 23.7 (7.1) 21.5 (6.0) 0.01 23.7 (7.5) 23.7 (7.0) 0.45
Education (y) 0.02 0.04
 None 4.2 6.2 5.1 4.1
 1 - 6 30.7 46.9 25.6 31.0
 7 - 9 31.0 25.9 15.4 31.8
 10 - 12 24.0 13.6 43.6 23.0
 >12 10.2 7.4 10.3 10.1
Pre-pregnancy BMI
(kg/m2)c
0.90 0.99
 ≤18.5 7.2 4.9 7.7 7.2
 18.6 - <25.0 57.5 46.9 56.4 57.5
 25.0 - <30.0 25.3 16.0 25.6 25.2
 ≥30 10.0 6.2 10.3 10.0
Smoked during
pregnancy
1.1 1.2 0.63 0.0 1.2
Drank alcohol during
pregnancyc
2.9 4.9 0.24 7.7 2.7 0.10
First prenatal care
visit
<0.01 0.51
 None 36.0 55.6 43.6 35.6
 First trimester 42.6 24.7 41.0 42.7
 After first
 trimester
21.3 19.8 15.4 21.6
Parityde 0.28 0.07
 1 41.4 46.9 56.4 40.6
 2 34.9 37.0 33.3 35.0
 3+ 23.7 16.0 10.3 24.4
Age at menarche
(y)bc
13.0 (2.0) 13.0 (2.0) 0.40 13.0 (2.0) 13.0 (2.0) 0.88
Height (cm)b 152.5 (7.7) 151.4 (8.1) 0.04 149.9 (7.5) 152.6 (7.8) 0.05
Serum p,p’-DDE
(μg/g)bf
2.7 (4.3) 1.7 (3.8) 0.01 1.6 (2.4) 2.7 (4.6) <0.01
Serum p,p’-DDT
(μg/g)bf
0.3 (0.6) 0.2 (0.5) <0.01 0.2 (0.2) 0.3 (0.7) <0.01
Worked outside
homee
31.5 35.8 0.43 33.3 31.4 0.80
Hospital of
recruitment
<0.01 0.68
 Social Security 49.4 28.4 46.2 49.5
 Ministry of Health 50.6 71.6 53.8 50.5
Residence areae 0.81 0.29
 Urban 59.4 58.0 51.3 59.8
 Rural 40.6 42.0 48.7 40.2
Poverty indexceg 0.07 0.86
 Poorest 70.7 66.7 66.7 70.9
 Less poor 19.0 11.1 20.5 19.0
 Not poor 10.2 2.5 10.3 10.1
Home ownerc 17.9 35.9 0.18
    Child
Gestational age (wk)b 40.0 (1.0) 39.0 (1.0) 0.13 39.7 (2.0) 40.0 (1.0) 0.09
Birth season 0.51 0.38
 Winter 20.1 14.8 28.2 19.6
 Spring 28.8 35.8 33.3 28.6
 Summer 28.0 27.2 23.1 28.3
 Autumn 23.1 22.2 15.4 23.5
Age at introduction
of formula or cow’s
milk (mo)bgh
6.0 (8.5) 3.0 (7.5) 0.06
Breastfeed everh 97.4 98.7 0.43
Ever exclusively
breastfeedh
89.7 83.3 0.29
Duration of any
breastfeeding (mo)bh
10.0 (9.8) 11.0 (12.9) 0.08
Duration of exclusive
breastfeeding (mo)bh
0.1 (2.0) 0.1 (1.0) 0.86
Age at introduction
of grains and cereal
(mo)bh
7.0 (6.0) 6.0 (3.0) 0.02
Number of older
siblings
0.22 <0.01
 0 43.0 53.1 59.0 42.2
 1 36.3 30.9 38.5 36.2
 2+ 20.7 16.0 2.6 21.6
Had a younger
sibling during
follow-uph
7.7 10.0 0.11

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; DDE, 1,1-dichloro-2,2-bis(p-chlorophenyl)ethylene; DDT, 1,1,1-trichloro-2,2-bis(4-chlorophenyl)ethane

a

Comparing subjects by follow-up status (followed vs. lost to follow-up) and those with at least one visit (one vs. 2+ visits) using Pearson’s chi-squared or Fisher’s exact tests for categorical and Kruskal-Wallis equality-of-populations rank test for continuous variables. All tests were two-sided

b

Median (interquartile range)

c

Variables with missing data: ≤ 2.5%, except for mother’s pre-pregnancy BMI (25.9%), age at menarche (49.4%), and poverty index (19.8%) in the lost to follow-up group

d

Parity of one at recruitment reflects the birth of the study child

e

Time-varying variables, information for those with at least one follow-up visit reflects their status at first visit

f

Determined from maternal serum samples drawn at delivery of the study child

g

Defined using Mexican national standards based on monthly per capita income: Urban (Poorest, ≤672 pesos; Less poor, >672 to ≤1,367; Not poor, >1,367) and Rural (Poorest, ≤ 495; Less poor, >495 to ≤946; Not poor, >946) (Cupul-Uicab et al., 2008)

h

The information was asked only in the follow-up study