Skip to main content
. 2008 Oct;18(5):413–447. doi: 10.1089/cap.2008.022

Table 1.

Published Blinded Studies of Stimulant Treatment of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Preschool Children

Authors Age Range (Mean ± SD) N/n < 6 years Procedure for ADHD Diagnosis Intervention Medication/Dose Study Design/Duration Outcome Assessment (for ADHD and disruptive behaviors) Study Outcome Side Effects/Safety
Conners, 1975 <6 years (57.7 ± 13.2 months) 59/59 Clinical interview, parent questionnaire (MPH 11.8 mg/day (1.5 mg/kg/day) Double-blind, 2 parallel groups (MPH, placebo)/6 weeks Parent Behavior Rating Scale, Global Clinical Improvement Rating, measures of vigilance, seat activity & impulsivity Significant clinical improvement (93% improved on MPH, 11.5% improved on placebo) as rated by the physician on the Global Clinical Improvement Rating, significant reduction in restlessness and disruptive behavior as rated by the parents on the Parent Behavior Rating Scale. Measures of vigilance, seat activity & impulsivity did not show significant difference between MPH and placebo Minimal side effects, trend towards elevated blood pressure in the MPH group
Schleifer et al., 1975 40–58 months (49 ± months1) 26/26 Clinical interview MPH 2.5–30 mg/day on a qd or bid schedule Double-blind, crossover (placebo & MPH “optimal dose”)/4–6 weeks Nursery school observation, Hyperactivity Rating Scale measures of reflectivity-impulsivity, field independence and motor impulsivity Improvement based on caregiver report, no improvement on nursery school observation or psychological measures Dysphoria, social withdrawal, poor appetite, difficulty getting to sleep
Barkely et al., 1984 48–119 months (60.8 ± 7.6 months) 54/18 Clinical interview, Conners' Rating Scale-Parent (CRS-P), WWPARS MPH 0.15 mg/kg bid, 1.5 mg/kg bid Double-blind, crossover (placebo & 2 MPH doses)/3 weeks Mother-child interaction Significant improvement in child compliance and off-task behavior with MPH, “normalizing” effect of MPH on mother-child interactions More frequent side effects on high MPH dose than low dose or placebo
Barkley et al., 1985 5–9 years (89 months1) 60/12 Psychiatric assessment, CRS-P, Werry Weiss Peters Activity Rating Scale (WWPARS), Home Situations Questionnaire (HSQ) MPH 0.3 mg/kg bid. 0.7 mg/kg bid Double-blind, crossover (placebo & 2 MPH doses)/4 weeks Mother-child interaction during free play and task periods Child compliance and length of sustained compliance improved with the higher dose during the task period, drug effects did not differ during free play or across age levels Greater number of side effects on MPH compared to placebo
Cunningham et al., 1985 4–6 years (68 months1) 42/12 Clinical diagnosis CRS-P Single dose of MPH 0.15 mg/kg, 0.50 mg/kg Double-blind, crossover (placebo & 2 MPH doses)/4 sessions Videotaped observations during freeplay, co-operative task, and simulated school setting ↓ actometer readings & ↑ on-task behavior during the simulated school setting, linear dose response, optimal ↓ in controlling and domineering interactions observed at 0.15 mg/kg dose with no incremental benefit on 0.50 mg/kg dose Side effects were not monitored
Barkley, 1988 31–59 months (46.8 ± 6.7 months) 27/27 Clinical interview, CRS-P, WWPARS, HSQ MPH 0.15 mg/kg bid, 1.5 mg/kg bid Triple-blind, crossover (placebo & 2 MPH doses)/3 weeks Mother-child interaction ↑ rates of compliance and length of sustained compliance with maternal commands, and on task behavior on higher dose during the task period Trend for more frequent side effects on MPH compared to placebo
Barkley, at al., 1988 5–12 years (8.5 ± 2.3 years) 23/not specified Semistructured parent interview, CRS-P or CRS- Teacher (CRS-T) MPH 0.3 mg/kg bid, 0.5 mg/kg bid Double-blind, crossover (placebo & 2 MPH doses)/3 weeks Gordon Diagnostic System (GDS) for vigilance and impulse control, playroom observation during a restricted academic situation, CRS-P, CRS- T, HSQ, School Situations Questionnaire (SSQ) 80% of the children responded positivly to MPH on parent and teacher ratings of hyperactivity and disruptive behaviors, and ↓ off-task and hyperacctivity ratings during playroom observation (restricted academic situation). Significant main drug effects for 16 of the 31 outcome measures, mostly on teacher ratings and observations during the restricted academic situation, both doses were equally effective No difference in the number or severity of side effects. Two children discontinued the study due to development of tics in response to the medication and were excluded from the study analysis
Speltz et al., 19882 51 months 1/1 Clinical interview, CRS-T Dextroamphet-amine (DEX) 2.5 mg bid DEX 5 mg bid and Day Program Double-blind time series (placebo & 2 DEX doses in counter- balanced order)/11 weeks Daily observations of 15-minute work periods and 20-minute free play for frequency of on-task behavior, and teacher ratings of aggressive and disruptive behaviors and reports of side effects ↓ off-task and aggressive behavior on DEX compared to placebo Behavior gains maintained at follow up 2 years later ↓ whining, listlessness, solitary play, stomachache ↓ appetite, more frequent during 5 mg bid dose
Fischer & Newby, 1991 2–17 years (8.9 ± 2.9 years) 161/not specified Semistructured parent interview, CRS-P, CRS-T, Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL), Teacher Rating Form (TRF) MPH 0.2 mg/kg & 0.4 mg/kg BID Double-blind crossover (placebo & 2 MPH doses)/3 weeks CRS-P, CRS-T, HSQ SSQ, reaction time, GDS viligance task Significant positive medication response on parent and teacher ratings of hyperactivity and laboratory measures of viligance and off-task behaviors, higher dose was most effective No side effects reported
Mayes et al., 19943 2–13 years (7.1 years1) 69/14 Clinical interview MPH 7.5–30 mg/day on a tid schedule Double-blind, ABA (placebo & MPH “optimal dose”)/3 weeks Conners' 10-item ADHD Parent Rating Scale 79.4% improved on MPH based parent ratings on the Conners' scale 50.7% experienced side effects irritability, ↓ appetite, lethargy
Musten et al., 1997; Firestone et al., 1998 48–70 months (58.1 ± 8.2 months) 31/31 Diagnostic Interview for Children and Adults-Parents (DICA-P), Swanson, Nolan and Pelham checklist (SNAP), CRS-P, attention task MPH 0.3 mg/kg bid, 0.5 mg/kg bid Double-blind, crossover (placebo & 2 MPH doses)/3 weeks Parent-child interaction tasks, CRS-P, GDS Delay and Vigilance Tasks ↑ attention and on-task during laboratory observation, ↓ impulsivitiy and hyperactivity as rated by parents on the CRS-P, no improved in compliance to parent requests 10% experienced severe side effects: social withdrawal, sadness, ↑ number & ↑ severity of side effects with the higher dose
Handen et al., 19994 48–71 months (58.9 ± 8.2 months) 11/11 Clinical interview, Preschool Behavior Questionaire (PBQ), CRS-P MPH 0.3 mg/kg/dose & 0.6 mg/kg/dose qd to tid Double-blind, crossover (placebo & 2 MPH doses)/3 weeks CRS-T, PBQ, direct behavior observation 72.7% improved on MPH based on at-least 40% reduction in teacher ratings of hyperactivity and inattention, significant improvement on clinic-based observations of activity level and level and compliance, more improvement on the higher dose 45% experienced side effects (social withdrawal and irritability); side effects more frequent at the higher dose
Short et al., 2004 <6 years (63 months1) 28/28 Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children-Parent (DISC-P) or clinical interview, Conners' Abbreviated Symptoms Questionnaire (CASQ), ADHD Rating Scale (ADHD-RS) MPH 5 mg, 10 mg, 15 mg bid or mixed amphetamine salts (MAS; Adderall) 5 mg, 10 mg & 15 mg qd Double-blind, crossover (placebo & 2 or 3 MPH or MAS doses)/3–4 weeks ASQ ADHD-RS, HSQ Improved parent and teacher ratings of ADHD on either stimulant by at least 1 SD in 82% of the children and by 2 SD in 50% of the children. Clinical ratings of normalized behavior on best dose in 82% of the children ↓ appetite, crying & rebound effects
Chacko et al., 2005 5–6 years (6.1 ± 0.57 months) 36/14 Structured parent interview, parent and teacher Disruptive Behavior Disorder rating scales MPH 0.3 mg/kg & 0.6 mg/kg bid and Behavior Modification System in a Summer Treatment Program Double-blind, crossover (placebo & 2 MPH doses)/8 weeks Point system, classroom rules, productivity and accuracy of class work Improved classroom behavior for following rules and noncompliance and class work completion on both MPH doses compared to placebo, little incremental improvement in classroom measures on the higher MPH dose compared to the lower MPH dose. 28% children improved with classroom behavioral intervention & showed no incremental benefit of MPH ↓ appetite
Greenhill et al., 2006 3–5.5 years (53 ± 8 months) 165/165 Clinical assessment for DSM-IV diagnosis of ADHD, unanimous consensus by the panel of investigators, CRS-P, CRS-T MPH 1.25 mg, 2.5 mg, 5.0 mg, 7.5 mg tid Double-blind, crossover (placebo & 4 MPH doses) after 10 weeks of parent training/5 weeks Swanson, Kotkin, Atkins, M-Flynn, and Pelham (SKAMP), Conners, Loney and Milch (CLAM) rating scales Significant ↓ in parent- and teacher-rated ADHD symptoms on the 3 higher doses ↓ appetite stomachache, and sleep difficulties, ↑ rates of social withdrawal and lethargy, ↑ growth velocity, 8.3% discontinued due to MPH side effects
1

SD not provided.

2

Individualized weekly parent training sessions, classroom behavior management program and social skills training group were also administered concurrently.

3

Included inpatient or outpatient preschool and school age children with autism, other developmental disorders or no developmental disorders.

4

Included preschool children with mental retardation.

ADHD = attention-deficity/hyperactivity disorder; MPH = methylphenidate.