Skip to main content
. 2010 Jul;13(3):247–255. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2010.05.005

Table 3.

Comparison of pQCT Cortical Bone Measurements of the Gambian and Cambridge Young Women at 50% Tibia Site

Gambian (n = 38)
Cambridge (n = 38)
% Diffa % Diff adjb Significant predictors
Median Interquartile range Median Interquartile range
Tot CSA (mm2) 409.3 381.0–444.0 407.0 383.5–457.0 −1.8 8.7∗ Wt∗∗, ht∗∗
Cort BMC (mg/mm) 298.6 266.5–326.2 316.4 297.5–352.4 −7.6∗∗ 0.9 Wt∗∗, ht∗
Cort CSA (mm2) 247.1 224.3–272.8 274.3 261.8–304.0 −12.6∗∗∗ −4.1 Wt∗∗
Cort BMD (mg/cm3) 1205 1189–1218 1146 1135–1159 4.9∗∗∗ 5.0∗∗∗
PeriC (mm) 71.7 69.2–74.7 71.5 69.4–75.8 −0.9 4.4∗ Ht∗∗, wt∗∗
EndoC (mm) 45.2 40.1–48.2 41.2 38.7–43.5 8.0∗∗ 14.7∗∗∗ Ht∗
Mean Cort thk (mm) 4.32 3.84–4.55 4.92 4.73–5.28 −15.0∗∗∗ −12.4∗∗ Wt∗
SSI (mm3) 1660 1477–1857 1543 1438–1934 2.1 16.7∗∗ Ht∗∗, wt∗∗

Significant predictors of group differences are shown (− indicates inverse relationship).

Significance of results indicated: ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01; ∗∗∗p < 0.001.

Abbr: Tot CSA, total cross-sectional area; Cort BMC, cortical bone mineral content; Cort CSA, cortical cross-sectional area; Cort BMD, cortical bone mineral density; PeriC, periosteal circumference; EndoC, endosteal circumference; Cort thk, cortical thickness; SSI, strength strain index; wt, weight; ht, height.

a

% Diff: percentage difference between groups calculated using linear regression. Positive differences indicate that Gambian values are greater.

b

% Diff adj: percentage difference between groups calculated after adjusting for weight, height, and age.